The Naga people—are united by shared ancestry, languages, cultural kinship, and a deep sense of political identity. Ethnically East Asian (as well as South-East Asian) and linguistically Sino-Tibetan (Tibeto-Burman) family, the Nagas have historically lived between the present-day India–Myanmar–China for centuries.
On May 16, 1951—the Nagas voted for their future. In a plebiscite organized by the Naga National Council (NNC), over 99.9% of Nagas—according to the NNC—voted for a free Naga Nation. B.N. Mullik, a Director of the Intelligence Bureau, Government of India, wrote in a secret declassified note titled “Naga agitation for independence” dated 26-6-1952 that “the Nagas again refrained from attending the Indian Republic Day celebrations in January 1951” and held a plebiscite on May 16, 1951 “in favour of an independent sovereign Naga state”; however, few sections of the Nagas opposed the independence move. In light of this, it was one of the most distinctive democratic and raw exercises in Asia’s postcolonial history. There were no guns or coercion—only ink thumb impressions of clarity to define their own destiny as a sovereign Naga Nation.
Britain, the departing imperial power in 1947, left the region without clarity, and offered no mediation. The Nagas did not see themselves as subjects inheriting a new colonial state, but as a people reclaiming their freedom—freedom before the imperial power annexed parts of their homeland. They made this clear three times: first, on January 10, 1929, with the Naga Political Memorandum to the Simon Commission of the British Parliament, then on August 14, 1947, with the declaration of Naga independence, and finally on May 16, 1951, with the plebiscite.
This extraordinary democratic act of May 16, 1951 voted for sovereignty—not secession. For continuity, not rebellion. It was simple, and sacred. It was a peaceful, and participatory act of self-determination. But what followed was not dialogue or political engagement, but military deployment and bullets against their vote. Subsequently, the Naga regions were militarized under layers of military suppression, conflict, and political amnesia. Worse, this act of democratic expression was silenced, and buried—buried by the Empire’s unfinished retreat—and erased by the two republics—India, and Burma (now Myanmar) that rush to nation-building as the republics claims to have inherited the empire’s territorial legacy.
The peaceful vote was met with repression for clarity, and further escalated into a full-scaled armed conflict between the republics and the Naga people. At the heart of this conflict lies a question that remains unresolved: What happens when a people speak clearly and democratically, but are not heard? It’s simple, the repression, and mistrust continues to this day, and it’s tempting to blame the Nagas for their resistance. But what choice was left when their peaceful decision was ignored? When a democratic vote is buried by force and military occupation, resistance becomes the language of survival.
International law—including the United Nations (UN) Charter and international treaties—enshrine the right to self-determination. If international support for referenda paved the way for peaceful recognition of some cases around the world, why did the world never see the Naga Plebiscite or the Nagas ink thumb impression to shape their own destiny? The message was clear: the Naga people sought to shape their own destiny. Yet, this collective act remains undocumented in official world histories—buried by global indifference that eventually drowned in decades of armed resistance and state retaliation.
The two republics, seeking to maintain territorial integrity, wrote it off as sedition or internal law and order issue. It was actively silenced by those who inherited the empire’s cartography. The world, more focused on Cold War alignments, and emerging great geopolitical gambit than postcolonial justice, moved on—but history has not.
Today, although the Naga nationalist groups, the Naga civil society organizations (CSOs) and even the approach to the Naga national movement have fragmented to some extent, however, more than seven decades later, the memory of the plebiscite still beats the hearts of the Naga people. As the Nagas commemorate the Naga Plebiscite Day across Naga homeland on May 16, 2025, regardless of organization affiliation, the world cannot afford to look away.
It was not a rebellion; it was a vote rooted in democratic principle—of courage and clarity. It did not threaten democracy; it practiced it. As questions and debates around indigenous rights, national identity, and decolonization intensify globally, the 1951 Naga Plebiscite deserves to be revisited—not as a footnote in insurgency or national security studies, but as a legitimate historical claim to self-rule.
About the Author: Augustine R. is an independent analyst and researcher specializing in international relations and geopolitical affairs. With a background in international relations, trade, and development, his interests span global security and economic diplomacy. He closely examines the India-Naga-Myanmar political conflict, Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) strategic nexus and the evolving foreign policy dynamics within the U.S.-China-India relationship triangle. View all articles by the author.
Featured Image: The Naga Plebiscite of May 16, 1951 / Photo: Internet
ICNA reserves all rights to the content submitted. The author’s views are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of icna.nl